News

Childcare centre takes on Geocon over Gungahlin tower

Ian Bushnell22 May 2020
The Establishment at Gungahlin

A render of The Establishment, two buildings and 290 apartments. Images: Geocon.

A David and Goliath struggle between a YMCA childcare centre and developers has been resurrected by a new development application to amend the previously approved application for a 15-storey residential tower in Gungahlin.

The new DA from Geocon and Empire Global for The Establishment, formerly known as Air Towers, on a site bounded by Gundaroo Drive, Gozzard Street and Swain Street, seeks to increase the number of units to 290 from 270, remove ground floor residential and replace it with commercial tenancies, remove the mezzanine level and add a pool and spa.

It also adds 27 parking spaces in the basements and at ground level, and makes facade changes.

The development has been a sore point in the community since it was first proposed as twin 26-storey towers, only to be reduced to 16 and eight storeys by the time it was approved in 2018.

Last year it was renamed after Empire Global announced a joint venture with Geocon to help it complete the project.

The YMCA and the Gungahlin Community Council both campaigned against the development and remain unhappy with the planning authority’s reasons for approval and arguments against their objections.

Now this new DA has presented another opportunity to mount their cases.

YMCA Chief Risk Officer Madeleine Taylor says the proposed development will overlook the childcare centre on Swain Street, with 100 units facing west with direct views of nappy changing and play areas.

Gungahlin landscape render

How the development sits in the Gungahlin landscape. As well as towering over the child care centre it will overlook two-storey units.

The YMCA had previously argued this contravened the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child but ACTPLA had argued that screening on the first four floors would impede views and be enough to not breach ACT privacy rules. Ms Taylor says the proposed facade changes remove these treatments.

Ms Taylor says a shared driveway off Swain Street for access to the basement parking and waste collection poses a significant safety risk to families at drop-off and pick up times.

She says the proposed extra apartment and commercial tenancies will also exacerbate already congested streets and parking shortages.

Ms Taylor says the proponents have failed to meet conditions of the approval and will not be able to meet the two-year start of construction deadline in September.

The Gungahlin Community Council, which is likely to submit its own representation, shares concerns about privacy, overshadowing and traffic, as well as the development’s unsuitability for the site.

GCC president Peter Elford said the development threatened the viability of the child care centre, ”not only during construction, when it is almost impossible to imagine how they could operate, but even after, with 100 units overlooking the centre, blocking out a lot of their sun, and 300 car spaces accessible through their tiny little car park”.

The Establishment at Gungahlin

Another view of The Establishment development.

Mr Elford questioned how this situation was allowed to happen.

”There is something inherently wrong here. Just because a developer is developing a site somehow they can effectively crush a business.”

Mr Elford is also concerned about the planning repercussions of the development which originally was meant to be an office block but now was a mini-suburb without adequate infrastructure such as green space and active travel links to service it.

”Where are children going to play? Where are people going to get their outside environment? What other investments are being planned or made to improve the cycling, walking and active travelling between that precinct and the parklands across the road at Gundaroo Drive or the Town Centre?”

The loss of office space also had implications for jobs in Gungahlin, and contributed to the area becoming a dormitory.

Mr Elford said the individual treatment of DAs led to an ad hoc approach to planning instead of one that took an overarching view.

He said there were also question marks over this DA, which addressed criteria that had been superseded by new planning rules for Gungahlin, encapsulated in Draft Variation 364.

”I would assume the DA has to comply with DV364,” he said.

The GCC was seeking advice from the planning directorate on this.

Original Article published by Ian Bushnell on The RiotACT.

What's Your Opinion?

Top